Effect of popper condition and mass on the energy and maximum height of poppers

Authors

  • Lorenzo Brunie Science & Engineering Magnet Program , Manalapan High School image/svg+xml
  • Jacob Kadan Science & Engineering Magnet Program , Manalapan High School image/svg+xml
  • Ethan Sobel Science & Engineering Magnet Program , Manalapan High School image/svg+xml
  • Tarun Ramesh Science & Engineering Magnet Program , Manalapan High School image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64804/jfgzkk08

Keywords:

popper, energy, work, energy conservation, kinematics, Tracker

Abstract

Poppers are inexpensive toys consisting of a ball and spring that are able to jump; each popper has an emoji design on its face. Using poppers as a model system to examine energy conservation, this experiment investigated how their mass and design/condition affected their maximum height and total mechanical energy. We examined two poppers, differentiated by mass and design/condition (5.50 g happy vs 5.40 g sad), and ran multiple trials. We recorded the maximum height and initial velocity using video kinematics. We found that the heavier, happy popper consistently reached greater heights and had a higher initial velocity and total energy than the lighter, sad popper. Due to previous usage, mechanical warping would occur in the sad popper, illustrating the effect of the specimen’s material condition on performance. We believe that specimen condition, i.e. from previous usage, is the primary factor influencing mechanical energy output rather than mass alone or emoji design, but concede our experimental design is unable to conclusively test between these alternatives.

References

P. A. Tipler and G. Mosca, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 5th ed. (W H Freeman and Company, New York, 2004).

R. A. Pelcovits and J. Farkas, Barron’s AP Physics C Premium (Kaplan North America, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 2024).

W. Moebs, S. J. Ling, and J. Sanny, University Physics, Vol. 1 (OpenStax, Houston, TX, 2016).

D. Brown, R. Hanson, and W. Christian, Tracker video analysis and modeling tool (2025), version 6.3.3.

M. Levine, D. Khettry, K. Coulanges, and R. A. A. Dela Rosa, Acceleration is constant during free fall, Journal of Science & Engineering 2, 41 (2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64804/x5ey9355

S. Dakwale, S. Hein, R. Wallace, and S. Yellapragada, The effect of initial vertical position on velocity at which an object strikes the ground, Journal of Science & Engineering 2, 35 (2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64804/sstdbq08

I. Sharma, B. DeMairo, and A. Liddawi, Analyzing Gallileo’s distance-time relationship for rolling motion on an inclined plane, Journal of Science & Engineering 2, 38 (2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64804/yzsmqz88

O. Ahmadzada, J. Pawelek, M. Butch, and T. Chung, Downward acceleration is independent of mass during free fall, Journal of Science & Engineering 2, 44 (2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64804/h4k7fv51

A. Hallur, J. Chan, M. Reznik, P. Zlotnikov, and J. Tiboni, Objects fall with constant acceleration regardless of mass, Journal of Science & Engineering 2, 53 (2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64804/hsepny74

L. Brunie, J. Kadan, E. Sobel, and T. Ramesh, Testing the independence of gravitational acceleration from mass: a comparative analysis of free-falling objects near earth’s surface, Journal of Science & Engineering 2, 50 (2026). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64804/bbdgcp59

R. Larson and R. P. Hostetler, Calculus, 8th ed. (Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 2005).

Downloads

Published

2026-05-17

Data Availability Statement

Data and analyses are available at https://github.com/devangel77b/427jkadan-lab3

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Brunie, L., Kadan, J., Sobel, E., & Ramesh, T. (2026). Effect of popper condition and mass on the energy and maximum height of poppers. Journal of Science & Engineering, 2(5), 114-117. https://doi.org/10.64804/jfgzkk08

Similar Articles

1-10 of 51

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)